Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 04:44

Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Tune In to NAIC Get Wolfe Glick’s Incineroar and Other Special Gifts - Pokemon.com
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Is anyone up to have a little conversation?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Bucheron and Myriel’s Karyn Tomlinson win James Beard Awards - Star Tribune
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Aut dolorem voluptates tempore maxime.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
First quantum-mechanical model of quasicrystals reveals why they exist - Phys.org